ASIA AM 113
Asian Americans and Law
Description: Lecture, four hours. Introduction to Asian American political identity and critical race theory--study of race and representation in making of modern American law and legal meaning. Survey of federal cases, legislation, and regulations pertaining to race, gender, and sexuality in Asian American community formations and relationality towards communities of color and indigenous communities, and making of nation-state. P/NP or letter grading.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
Most Helpful Review
Spring 2021 - i stopped attending lecture halfway through the quarter because it was a bit boring, but it was still possible to do well in the class! the midterm and final were graded really easily and the professor was really kind and understanding about extensions. the readings were interesting, but the live lectures were just discussions that didn't really add anything in my opinion. she posts her own lectures which i think are more helpful.
Spring 2021 - i stopped attending lecture halfway through the quarter because it was a bit boring, but it was still possible to do well in the class! the midterm and final were graded really easily and the professor was really kind and understanding about extensions. the readings were interesting, but the live lectures were just discussions that didn't really add anything in my opinion. she posts her own lectures which i think are more helpful.
AD
Most Helpful Review
Very boring, he seems like an amateur professor. Wasn't very helpful. Only a 12 page paper and a final (50%/50%). The questions on the final were ambiguous and we couldn't even ask questions because he wasn't there to proctor the test. He required us to buy a book for the class that we didn't even use-basically he wanted to use the excuse of a required reading to make money for a book published by some kind of coalition he was a part of. I have so many complaints about this class it isn't even funny.
Very boring, he seems like an amateur professor. Wasn't very helpful. Only a 12 page paper and a final (50%/50%). The questions on the final were ambiguous and we couldn't even ask questions because he wasn't there to proctor the test. He required us to buy a book for the class that we didn't even use-basically he wanted to use the excuse of a required reading to make money for a book published by some kind of coalition he was a part of. I have so many complaints about this class it isn't even funny.