ENGCOMP 2I
Approaches to University Writing
Description: Lecture, six hours. Requisite: demonstrated proficiency on Analytical Writing Placement Examination (enforced) or course 1B (C or better). Second course in university-level discourse, with analysis and critique of university-level texts. Emphasis on strategies for developing coherent and well-argued pieces of academic writing and for achieving effective and clear style in academic prose. Completion of course with grade of C or better satisfies Entry-Level Writing and English as a Second Language requirements. Letter grading.
Units: 5.0
Units: 5.0
1 of 2
Most Helpful Review
Fall 2017 - Overall, she's a great professor! This course is like an initial step for college writing, and Professor Sherwood is really patient and thought-provoking. She's concerned with every question students might ask and very specific about her requirements. Though a little bit heavy workload, you should expect high scores as long as you keep up with the normal pace. I feel I was only average in our class, but I got an A finally.
Fall 2017 - Overall, she's a great professor! This course is like an initial step for college writing, and Professor Sherwood is really patient and thought-provoking. She's concerned with every question students might ask and very specific about her requirements. Though a little bit heavy workload, you should expect high scores as long as you keep up with the normal pace. I feel I was only average in our class, but I got an A finally.
AD
Most Helpful Review
Fall 2016 - This review is actually for ENG CCOMP 2 which I took with professor Galvin. Her classes are boring and unengaging. Though I must say that the topics discussed in class are actually rather interesting. Professor Galvin has this special ability to lag, like a computer under a virus-attack. She possesses only one type of hear and it is slow, slow slow. Her processing is so slow and as a result, she mumbles unclear information in fragments and pieces, which makes the ambiguous information being presented even more confusing for us. Members of the class always have to whisper among ourselves to piece together the disintegrated information we may have, but that does not seem to work as well. Her classes are slow paced but relaxing. Though I cannot say I enjoyed this class, the class was reasonably easy and Professor is fair on work set.
Fall 2016 - This review is actually for ENG CCOMP 2 which I took with professor Galvin. Her classes are boring and unengaging. Though I must say that the topics discussed in class are actually rather interesting. Professor Galvin has this special ability to lag, like a computer under a virus-attack. She possesses only one type of hear and it is slow, slow slow. Her processing is so slow and as a result, she mumbles unclear information in fragments and pieces, which makes the ambiguous information being presented even more confusing for us. Members of the class always have to whisper among ourselves to piece together the disintegrated information we may have, but that does not seem to work as well. Her classes are slow paced but relaxing. Though I cannot say I enjoyed this class, the class was reasonably easy and Professor is fair on work set.
AD
1 of 2
