ENGL 165C
Protestant Dissent and English Literature, 1640 to 1832
Description: Lecture, four hours; discussion, one hour (when scheduled). Enforced requisite: English Composition 3 or 3H. Religious doctrines, political ideologies, cultural practices, and aesthetics of Protestant dissent, with some attention to transatlantic radicalism, but main topic is British dissent. Adaptations of such theologies as Lutheranism, Calvinism, Anabaptism, Unitarianism, and Methodism in Scotland, England, and Wales from English Civil War and Glorious Revolution to Reform Act of 1832. Texts include representative theology and political theory (Luther, Calvin, Locke, Priestley, Paine, Wollstonecraft) and representative poetry and fiction (Milton, Bunyan, Defoe, Blake, Coleridge, Shelley, Byron). P/NP or letter grading.
Units: 5.0
Units: 5.0
Last Name
- Last Name
- First Name
- Number of Ratings
- Avg. Overall
- Avg. Easiness
- Avg. Workload
- Avg. Clarity
- Avg. Helpfulness
1 of 1
Most Helpful Review
Spring 2014 - The professor is a smart man who teaches the subject extremely well. However, I do wish that Maniquis could learn to be more sensitive about race, ethnicity, and disabilities. He often makes unnecessary, thoughtless, an insensitive comments on these sensitive issues. Thus, he shows his lack of understanding of the complexities that such matters entail; consequently, he often ends up insulting, belittling, and hurting others. Perhaps he should learn to bite his tongue or realize that teeth were made not only to bite but to placate the thoughtless tongue from uttering harsh and useless comments. If Maniquis were more sensitive and thoughtful, I would consider him to be not only a stellar professor but a remarkable man.
Spring 2014 - The professor is a smart man who teaches the subject extremely well. However, I do wish that Maniquis could learn to be more sensitive about race, ethnicity, and disabilities. He often makes unnecessary, thoughtless, an insensitive comments on these sensitive issues. Thus, he shows his lack of understanding of the complexities that such matters entail; consequently, he often ends up insulting, belittling, and hurting others. Perhaps he should learn to bite his tongue or realize that teeth were made not only to bite but to placate the thoughtless tongue from uttering harsh and useless comments. If Maniquis were more sensitive and thoughtful, I would consider him to be not only a stellar professor but a remarkable man.
1 of 1
