PSYCH 116
Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory
Description: Lecture, one hour; laboratory, three hours. Requisites: courses 10, 100A, 100B, 115. Designed for Psychobiology and Psychology majors. Laboratory experience with various topics in behavioral neuroscience. P/NP or letter grading.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2018 - Great professor for 116. This class is naturally a lot of work and the concepts can require a lot of memorization, but he communicates everything very clearly and effectively. The class is split into three modules: neuroanatomy, Swimmy (neuronal circuits), and visual neuroscience. Neuroanatomy was definitely the hardest and required solid understanding and identification of every brain structure. The other two modules are pretty easy and are graded on lab write-ups. Overall, highly recommend taking 116 with Wong.
Winter 2018 - Great professor for 116. This class is naturally a lot of work and the concepts can require a lot of memorization, but he communicates everything very clearly and effectively. The class is split into three modules: neuroanatomy, Swimmy (neuronal circuits), and visual neuroscience. Neuroanatomy was definitely the hardest and required solid understanding and identification of every brain structure. The other two modules are pretty easy and are graded on lab write-ups. Overall, highly recommend taking 116 with Wong.
Most Helpful Review
Dr. Zaidel taught the last few weeks of Psych 116 during Fall 2001. He's a nice guy, but he completely underestimates the amount of work that he gives his students. We had to write a paper that was due finals week, and he was talking about how the paper was no big deal, and how it should only be 5 pages long. I basically spent 3 days doing nothing but working on that paper, and it turned out to be 12 pages long, and mine was one of the shorter ones. Oh well, I still recommend this professor. At least his lectures weren't dull.
Dr. Zaidel taught the last few weeks of Psych 116 during Fall 2001. He's a nice guy, but he completely underestimates the amount of work that he gives his students. We had to write a paper that was due finals week, and he was talking about how the paper was no big deal, and how it should only be 5 pages long. I basically spent 3 days doing nothing but working on that paper, and it turned out to be 12 pages long, and mine was one of the shorter ones. Oh well, I still recommend this professor. At least his lectures weren't dull.