Professor

Artur Davoyan

AD
3.6
Overall Ratings
Based on 17 Users
Easiness 3.1 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.3 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 3.1 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (17)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
June 26, 2019
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: B+

He oversimplified all his lectures, leaving all the students lost when it came to the actual homework assignments. His midterms and finals weren't excessively hard but no one knew what to expect on them. He was very passionate about what he was teaching but seemed like he should have been teaching an upper division orbits class rather than an entry level dynamics class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 30, 2022
Quarter: Winter 2022
Grade: A

Looking at the previous reviews, I can say Davoyan definitely took these complaints to heart. He literally said at the beginning of the quarter that some students had complained about the derivations before so I'm sure he's heard and addressed everything else past reviews have mentioned. The lectures were pretty engaging with plenty of real world examples. He even brought in his son's toy robot arm a few times, which was pretty funny. Tests were... almost too easy to be completely honest. Given the reputation this topic has at other schools, I definitely feel like I did not struggle enough in this class, which does sound a bit weird to type. I still do think I learned something useful though.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 21, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A

Disclaimer: I took this class online during the COVID-19 pandemic.

I'm not sure if this class was really like Physics 1A/AP Physics 1, or it was just taught that way, but that's how it came out to be. The lectures were pretty dry, and this class was pretty formulaic as a whole. If you care to learn more about the conceptual side, it'll be there for you, but if not, you can definitely get by in the class by just knowing the equations. Prof. Davoyan's grading scheme is really great, as everything is worth 20%, and he also gives extra credit on all of his exams.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 23, 2019
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A+

I had the privilege of taking MAE 102 with Professor Davoyan, and would highly recommend this course as taught by him. He is extremely passionate about the subject, as his own research involves space propulsion and orbital mechanics.

The level of difficulty of this course is perfectly reasonable; the exams are extremely straightforward, with generous grading and partial credit. Extra credit opportunities are available throughout the course, both through "extra" exam questions and external mini-projects.

The homework consisted of 10-15 selected problems from the textbook; the workload was reasonable both in time and difficulty. In discussion, the key concepts of each homework set were rigorously covered by the TA, allowing students to fully understand any material that was not already explained in lecture. Both Professor Davoyan and the TAs were extremely welcoming to students, with extensive office hours and opportunities during lecture to ask questions about any concepts covered.

As taught by this professor, it is certainly possible to put in the minimum amount of work and still receive a good grade; however, anyone who did that would be missing out on extremely interesting subject matter taught by a brilliant professor. I would highly recommend this course for those who seek a comprehensive understanding of rigid-body dynamics from an engineering/physics standpoint.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 15, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: P

Honestly the reviews for this professor were good and the subject material seemed cool so I was excited. I should NOT have been. He did not care at all about the situations at hand and made homework assignments really hard so that you had to literally learn MATLAB to be able to do them?? which did not help me understand any of the material?? His tests were kinda ridiculous, not even because they were hard just because I couldn't understand what he was asking at all for the conceptual ones and thought my answer was really good but then he graded horribly and was not understanding of regrade requests at all. His office hours were terrifying because he would just imply you were stupid. Overall do not recommend.

Helpful?

0 2 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 16, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A

Also taken during the quarantine quarter. The lectures weren't super useful for most of the homework problems, which were directly from the book, and I didn't pay much attention to most of them, especially since for most of the class the material isn't that bad and just builds off of physics concepts you should already know. The most complicated part of the class is the very last chapter and a half or so. The lectures were kind of useful for answering the conceptual questions he asked on tests and other test problems that he wrote himself, but most if not all lectures were recorded and his notes uploaded to CCLE so you could go back and check if you wanted to. The test and homework questions he wrote himself (or had the TAs write I'm not sure) were often unclear in what they were asking and required several follow-ups to try and clarify what they're asking (a lot of the time these weren't super helpful either and a lot of the class was still confused). The final was kinda weird and someone else already mentioned what it was, but he did solve a somewhat similar problem in lecture so that helped in answering the question.

The MATLAB portions of the homework weren't bad but could be unclear and time-consuming if you've never used MATLAB before (which I hadn't). Thankfully there were only a few of these.

He made all the tests week-long take-home assignments, so they were essentially like homework assignments and weren't much more difficult if at all. I don't know why people are complaining about him being unaccommodating considering you literally had to spend zero time studying for this class since you could just run lectures in the background to get an idea of the material for the week then use the book, internet, and slader to solve the homework and tests as you're doing them.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: B+
June 26, 2019

He oversimplified all his lectures, leaving all the students lost when it came to the actual homework assignments. His midterms and finals weren't excessively hard but no one knew what to expect on them. He was very passionate about what he was teaching but seemed like he should have been teaching an upper division orbits class rather than an entry level dynamics class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
Quarter: Winter 2022
Grade: A
March 30, 2022

Looking at the previous reviews, I can say Davoyan definitely took these complaints to heart. He literally said at the beginning of the quarter that some students had complained about the derivations before so I'm sure he's heard and addressed everything else past reviews have mentioned. The lectures were pretty engaging with plenty of real world examples. He even brought in his son's toy robot arm a few times, which was pretty funny. Tests were... almost too easy to be completely honest. Given the reputation this topic has at other schools, I definitely feel like I did not struggle enough in this class, which does sound a bit weird to type. I still do think I learned something useful though.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A
June 21, 2020

Disclaimer: I took this class online during the COVID-19 pandemic.

I'm not sure if this class was really like Physics 1A/AP Physics 1, or it was just taught that way, but that's how it came out to be. The lectures were pretty dry, and this class was pretty formulaic as a whole. If you care to learn more about the conceptual side, it'll be there for you, but if not, you can definitely get by in the class by just knowing the equations. Prof. Davoyan's grading scheme is really great, as everything is worth 20%, and he also gives extra credit on all of his exams.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A+
June 23, 2019

I had the privilege of taking MAE 102 with Professor Davoyan, and would highly recommend this course as taught by him. He is extremely passionate about the subject, as his own research involves space propulsion and orbital mechanics.

The level of difficulty of this course is perfectly reasonable; the exams are extremely straightforward, with generous grading and partial credit. Extra credit opportunities are available throughout the course, both through "extra" exam questions and external mini-projects.

The homework consisted of 10-15 selected problems from the textbook; the workload was reasonable both in time and difficulty. In discussion, the key concepts of each homework set were rigorously covered by the TA, allowing students to fully understand any material that was not already explained in lecture. Both Professor Davoyan and the TAs were extremely welcoming to students, with extensive office hours and opportunities during lecture to ask questions about any concepts covered.

As taught by this professor, it is certainly possible to put in the minimum amount of work and still receive a good grade; however, anyone who did that would be missing out on extremely interesting subject matter taught by a brilliant professor. I would highly recommend this course for those who seek a comprehensive understanding of rigid-body dynamics from an engineering/physics standpoint.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: P
June 15, 2020

Honestly the reviews for this professor were good and the subject material seemed cool so I was excited. I should NOT have been. He did not care at all about the situations at hand and made homework assignments really hard so that you had to literally learn MATLAB to be able to do them?? which did not help me understand any of the material?? His tests were kinda ridiculous, not even because they were hard just because I couldn't understand what he was asking at all for the conceptual ones and thought my answer was really good but then he graded horribly and was not understanding of regrade requests at all. His office hours were terrifying because he would just imply you were stupid. Overall do not recommend.

Helpful?

0 2 Please log in to provide feedback.
MECH&AE 102
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A
June 16, 2020

Also taken during the quarantine quarter. The lectures weren't super useful for most of the homework problems, which were directly from the book, and I didn't pay much attention to most of them, especially since for most of the class the material isn't that bad and just builds off of physics concepts you should already know. The most complicated part of the class is the very last chapter and a half or so. The lectures were kind of useful for answering the conceptual questions he asked on tests and other test problems that he wrote himself, but most if not all lectures were recorded and his notes uploaded to CCLE so you could go back and check if you wanted to. The test and homework questions he wrote himself (or had the TAs write I'm not sure) were often unclear in what they were asking and required several follow-ups to try and clarify what they're asking (a lot of the time these weren't super helpful either and a lot of the class was still confused). The final was kinda weird and someone else already mentioned what it was, but he did solve a somewhat similar problem in lecture so that helped in answering the question.

The MATLAB portions of the homework weren't bad but could be unclear and time-consuming if you've never used MATLAB before (which I hadn't). Thankfully there were only a few of these.

He made all the tests week-long take-home assignments, so they were essentially like homework assignments and weren't much more difficult if at all. I don't know why people are complaining about him being unaccommodating considering you literally had to spend zero time studying for this class since you could just run lectures in the background to get an idea of the material for the week then use the book, internet, and slader to solve the homework and tests as you're doing them.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!