Barbara Herman
Department of Philosophy
AD
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 19 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Often Funny
  • Would Take Again
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Participation Matters
  • Tolerates Tardiness
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
36.7%
30.6%
24.5%
18.4%
12.2%
6.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.3%
22.7%
18.2%
13.6%
9.1%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (11)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 29, 2007

22W was very demanding; there were 3 essays (draft and final draft) and 4 tests. She's a great professor, she always comes prepared for class, she engages the students by constantly asking questions, she's always available to answer questions and she responds to emails faster than any professor I know.
However because there we covered 5 philosophers (Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Hume, Mill) I don't feel like I spent enough time on any one of them to thoroughly understand their theories. Also, the grading for the papers was difficult but the TAs were great. Don't take this class unless you can show up to lecture ready to take lots of notes because paying attention in lecture is key to understanding the theories.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 29, 2007

22W was very demanding; there were 3 essays (draft and final draft) and 4 tests. She's a great professor, she always comes prepared for class, she engages the students by constantly asking questions, she's always available to answer questions and she responds to emails faster than any professor I know.
However because there we covered 5 philosophers (Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Hume, Mill) I don't feel like I spent enough time on any one of them to thoroughly understand their theories. Also, the grading for the papers was difficult but the TAs were great. Don't take this class unless you can show up to lecture ready to take lots of notes because paying attention in lecture is key to understanding the theories.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 19 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Often Funny
    (7)
  • Would Take Again
    (8)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (6)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (6)
  • Participation Matters
    (6)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (5)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!