David L Glanzman
Department of Physiological Science
AD
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 1.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Often Funny
  • Tough Tests
  • Uses Slides
  • Is Podcasted
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Would Take Again
  • Tolerates Tardiness
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
38.2%
31.8%
25.5%
19.1%
12.7%
6.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

56.9%
47.4%
37.9%
28.4%
19.0%
9.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.8%
21.5%
17.2%
12.9%
8.6%
4.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.1%
23.4%
18.8%
14.1%
9.4%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.4%
21.2%
16.9%
12.7%
8.5%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.2%
25.2%
20.1%
15.1%
10.1%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.0%
23.3%
18.6%
14.0%
9.3%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.4%
17.9%
14.3%
10.7%
7.1%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

31.5%
26.2%
21.0%
15.7%
10.5%
5.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.8%
25.6%
20.5%
15.4%
10.3%
5.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: B
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Feb. 17, 2022

Very interesting material but one of the hardest classes I've taken as a PhySci major. Lectures, which were recorded on BruinCast, were long and I found them really difficult to pay attention to. Exams (mostly short answer and some multiple choice) were also difficult, with the average around 60-70% for the midterm. He curves at the end of the quarter but doesn't say how much.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: A
Dec. 29, 2021

I took this class as an elective for the neuro major and really enjoyed it. A lot of the content was building upon what we learned in the 101C modules so I definitely recommend this class if you already have a foundation of learning and memory. Dr. Glanzman is very kind, approachable, and passionate about this topic. The lectures are long, but I found them to be engaging. The class doesn't focus too much on actual human memory until the last few weeks, so if you want to learn about people -- look elsewhere. The two exams were difficult, but I believe the final grading scheme had a generous scaling system. I scored low B's on both exams but finished the class with an A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 21, 2018

The first half of the class is basically Glanzman's 101C module. The second half presents more information, but the difficulty level is about the same. It was about half physci and half neuro majors. The material and exams weren't easy, but I think the grading curve was decent. Overall it's not bad, I'd recommend taking this class if you're interested in learning/memory.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+
Feb. 24, 2017

Of all the electives I've taken for neuro, this one has been my favorite by far. The material is similar to what's covered in the second module of Neuro m101C, but he goes much more in depth . There's a lot of experiments you have to memorize but the material is fascinating and Glanzman teaches it very well.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: B
Feb. 17, 2022

Very interesting material but one of the hardest classes I've taken as a PhySci major. Lectures, which were recorded on BruinCast, were long and I found them really difficult to pay attention to. Exams (mostly short answer and some multiple choice) were also difficult, with the average around 60-70% for the midterm. He curves at the end of the quarter but doesn't say how much.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: A
Dec. 29, 2021

I took this class as an elective for the neuro major and really enjoyed it. A lot of the content was building upon what we learned in the 101C modules so I definitely recommend this class if you already have a foundation of learning and memory. Dr. Glanzman is very kind, approachable, and passionate about this topic. The lectures are long, but I found them to be engaging. The class doesn't focus too much on actual human memory until the last few weeks, so if you want to learn about people -- look elsewhere. The two exams were difficult, but I believe the final grading scheme had a generous scaling system. I scored low B's on both exams but finished the class with an A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
June 21, 2018

The first half of the class is basically Glanzman's 101C module. The second half presents more information, but the difficulty level is about the same. It was about half physci and half neuro majors. The material and exams weren't easy, but I think the grading curve was decent. Overall it's not bad, I'd recommend taking this class if you're interested in learning/memory.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+
Feb. 24, 2017

Of all the electives I've taken for neuro, this one has been my favorite by far. The material is similar to what's covered in the second module of Neuro m101C, but he goes much more in depth . There's a lot of experiments you have to memorize but the material is fascinating and Glanzman teaches it very well.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 1.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Often Funny
    (4)
  • Tough Tests
    (4)
  • Uses Slides
    (3)
  • Is Podcasted
    (3)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (3)
  • Would Take Again
    (3)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!