Diana Rigeur
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology
AD
4.3
Overall Rating
Based on 14 Users
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Is Podcasted
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Often Funny
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (13)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: N/A
Aug. 6, 2020

Selling Principles of Development Wolpert 6 edition pdf for $30. Text (925) 338-9643

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
April 1, 2020

Amazing professor and TAs

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: N/A
March 18, 2020

Lectures - majority of content on lecture slides will show up on the exams. The drawback is that there is a ton of content.

Content - I enjoyed the subject a lot and it was very interesting. It's actually heavy on genetics and seeing how gene expression controls cell diversity, leading to the complexity of development. Stem cells come up as well which is super interesting.

Discussion - Rachel was an amazing TA, but the way the discussion was set up, nobody ever really learned much from discussion. You have to read one full research paper before discussion, but the papers are often very long and complex so it wasn't possible to ever feel like you understood the paper. There's also a report due every week on each paper you read.

Professor - Dr. Rigueur offered plenty of OH and encouraged to ask questions, and she is overall very kind. Her lecture style was ok but sometimes she spoke extremely fast so laptops are good to take notes.

Midterms - Each midterm covered 5 lectures + 2-3 research papers covered in discussion. It's multiple choice, short response, and true/false. Most of the class had trouble with the multiple choice and you can lose quite a lot of points just by missing a couple. The short response has a lot of experimental questions, so it all depends on whether you understand the concepts. Average for the first midterm was around 70%, so I guess it's not that different from other MCDB classes.

Final - The final covered 8 lectures plus it was cumulative, and also covered the research papers covered in discussion....this was a lot of content. Luckily, she decided to make the final open notes/book/slides due to COVID-19. If this was not open notes, I would have 100% done very poorly. For the exams, no matter how early you study, it was really difficult to ever feel confident about the material due to the sheer volume of material.

Extra credit - she made clicker questions extra credit, so if you attend every lecture you'll get free extra credit points for just being there. she also had one extra credit question on every exam.

Tip - use OH and ask as many questions, and email the TAs with questions

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: N/A
Aug. 6, 2020

Selling Principles of Development Wolpert 6 edition pdf for $30. Text (925) 338-9643

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
April 1, 2020

Amazing professor and TAs

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: N/A
March 18, 2020

Lectures - majority of content on lecture slides will show up on the exams. The drawback is that there is a ton of content.

Content - I enjoyed the subject a lot and it was very interesting. It's actually heavy on genetics and seeing how gene expression controls cell diversity, leading to the complexity of development. Stem cells come up as well which is super interesting.

Discussion - Rachel was an amazing TA, but the way the discussion was set up, nobody ever really learned much from discussion. You have to read one full research paper before discussion, but the papers are often very long and complex so it wasn't possible to ever feel like you understood the paper. There's also a report due every week on each paper you read.

Professor - Dr. Rigueur offered plenty of OH and encouraged to ask questions, and she is overall very kind. Her lecture style was ok but sometimes she spoke extremely fast so laptops are good to take notes.

Midterms - Each midterm covered 5 lectures + 2-3 research papers covered in discussion. It's multiple choice, short response, and true/false. Most of the class had trouble with the multiple choice and you can lose quite a lot of points just by missing a couple. The short response has a lot of experimental questions, so it all depends on whether you understand the concepts. Average for the first midterm was around 70%, so I guess it's not that different from other MCDB classes.

Final - The final covered 8 lectures plus it was cumulative, and also covered the research papers covered in discussion....this was a lot of content. Luckily, she decided to make the final open notes/book/slides due to COVID-19. If this was not open notes, I would have 100% done very poorly. For the exams, no matter how early you study, it was really difficult to ever feel confident about the material due to the sheer volume of material.

Extra credit - she made clicker questions extra credit, so if you attend every lecture you'll get free extra credit points for just being there. she also had one extra credit question on every exam.

Tip - use OH and ask as many questions, and email the TAs with questions

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
4.3
Overall Rating
Based on 14 Users
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.1 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (8)
  • Is Podcasted
    (6)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (6)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Snazzy Dresser
    (2)
  • Tough Tests
    (5)
  • Participation Matters
    (5)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (7)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (6)
  • Often Funny
    (4)
  • Would Take Again
    (5)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!