- Home
- Search
- Muriel C McClendon
- HIST 1B
AD
Based on 46 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Often Funny
- Would Take Again
- Tolerates Tardiness
- Participation Matters
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
McClendon isn't a bad professor. She's an interesting lecturer, although her powerpoints are basically useless. You will have to go to lectures and take thorough notes to get a good grade.
This wasn't the easiest history class, especially since she doesn't give out study guides and the breadth of general knowledge you're required to have is huge. Note the distinction between breadth and depth - there's a ton of material that spans nine or ten centuries, you just need to know the basics about everything. Her tests have two parts, a short answer ID section where you pick from a list of terms and write a paragraph about each one, and just a straight-up essay (two on the final). Grading depends largely on your TA. It's not a free A by any means but if you put effort into it you'll survive.
Don't take this class if you want to get an easy A for your GE requirement. You have to know so much. And she can get boring sometimes. But if you like European History, then I guess go for it. (from Carolingian empire to the reformation?)
What a sweet, funny, and sensible professor.
Professor M. was what made lectures enjoyable and easy to listen to. She has a good sense of humor and likes to interact with her students. Her lectures were very straightforward and so comprehensive that often times, I just ignored my textbook and studied my notes for the exams.
I did not regret taking this course or her, and if I had to, I'd do it again.
Thanks Professor Mcclendon!
Really nice lady with an awesome sense humor. I took this class pass/fail, so I didn't try very hard, never read, never went to class, + any slacker trait.
Anyway, the class was really chill and lax. She is a very charismatic lecturer, but sometimes she can get really deep into the history. What I mean is some of her lectures delve into some really insignificant events which she touches briefly. BUT, these minor events will be on your exams, so you will require computer-like memory to ace them.
Personally, I was lost throughout the whole class and on the final, I couldn't answer a single question. But I got a Pass. She's freaking awesome.
Prof. McClendon is a very good lecturer. Classes were not boring at all: what you got out of them were what you put into them. The readings were not too bad, lectures were fun, just 1 paper... You guys need to lighten up.
This class was pretty easy. There's only one essay and you have three opportunities to turn one in. Her lectures were not that great, you kind of felt like you were in a high school history class where you would actually get more insight of the events from the textbook.
The professor herself is not very hard, she's more outgoing and likes the big lecture hall to participate (gets kind of annoying sometimes). Your grade depends on the TA so you don't have to even go to the lectures. RECOMMENDED? yeah I guess, but there's better history classes out there.
these ratings you see above are probably useless, because it is the TA who decides your very subjective grade (read: sucking up probably helps). i had a great TA, but i don't think mcclendon dove too deep into the really important ideas of western civ in her lectures. as a bio major taking this class for a GE, i think the class is easy provided you have a good TA, can write decently, and do most of the readings.
Great Class. If you read her syllabus and compare it to the other 1B classes offered by other prof's, her's is the least intimidating by far! And she's so sweet. I had an issue, and she was very approachable and accommodating. My TA was great, as she was not a stickler for dates. Good class. Good GE... and I DO NOT like history!
McClendon isn't a bad professor. She's an interesting lecturer, although her powerpoints are basically useless. You will have to go to lectures and take thorough notes to get a good grade.
This wasn't the easiest history class, especially since she doesn't give out study guides and the breadth of general knowledge you're required to have is huge. Note the distinction between breadth and depth - there's a ton of material that spans nine or ten centuries, you just need to know the basics about everything. Her tests have two parts, a short answer ID section where you pick from a list of terms and write a paragraph about each one, and just a straight-up essay (two on the final). Grading depends largely on your TA. It's not a free A by any means but if you put effort into it you'll survive.
Don't take this class if you want to get an easy A for your GE requirement. You have to know so much. And she can get boring sometimes. But if you like European History, then I guess go for it. (from Carolingian empire to the reformation?)
What a sweet, funny, and sensible professor.
Professor M. was what made lectures enjoyable and easy to listen to. She has a good sense of humor and likes to interact with her students. Her lectures were very straightforward and so comprehensive that often times, I just ignored my textbook and studied my notes for the exams.
I did not regret taking this course or her, and if I had to, I'd do it again.
Thanks Professor Mcclendon!
Really nice lady with an awesome sense humor. I took this class pass/fail, so I didn't try very hard, never read, never went to class, + any slacker trait.
Anyway, the class was really chill and lax. She is a very charismatic lecturer, but sometimes she can get really deep into the history. What I mean is some of her lectures delve into some really insignificant events which she touches briefly. BUT, these minor events will be on your exams, so you will require computer-like memory to ace them.
Personally, I was lost throughout the whole class and on the final, I couldn't answer a single question. But I got a Pass. She's freaking awesome.
Prof. McClendon is a very good lecturer. Classes were not boring at all: what you got out of them were what you put into them. The readings were not too bad, lectures were fun, just 1 paper... You guys need to lighten up.
This class was pretty easy. There's only one essay and you have three opportunities to turn one in. Her lectures were not that great, you kind of felt like you were in a high school history class where you would actually get more insight of the events from the textbook.
The professor herself is not very hard, she's more outgoing and likes the big lecture hall to participate (gets kind of annoying sometimes). Your grade depends on the TA so you don't have to even go to the lectures. RECOMMENDED? yeah I guess, but there's better history classes out there.
these ratings you see above are probably useless, because it is the TA who decides your very subjective grade (read: sucking up probably helps). i had a great TA, but i don't think mcclendon dove too deep into the really important ideas of western civ in her lectures. as a bio major taking this class for a GE, i think the class is easy provided you have a good TA, can write decently, and do most of the readings.
Great Class. If you read her syllabus and compare it to the other 1B classes offered by other prof's, her's is the least intimidating by far! And she's so sweet. I had an issue, and she was very approachable and accommodating. My TA was great, as she was not a stickler for dates. Good class. Good GE... and I DO NOT like history!
Based on 46 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (11)
- Often Funny (9)
- Would Take Again (9)
- Tolerates Tardiness (7)
- Participation Matters (8)