- Home
- Search
- Neha Kumar
- MGMT 164
AD
Based on 7 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Engaging Lectures
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Honestly the class wasn't too bad but the professor was extremely unclear on the grading. She didn't upload the final grades till 2 days after the due date and we had no way of knowing why we got the grade we did. Tests and quizzes were unable to be reviewed so we could see what we did wrong, and it was frustrating to just randomly see a grade at the end with no real explanation. For the actual material, the professor is really nice and tells a lot about her own experience in the entrepreneurial space, which is really cool. She also had to deal with some issues in the beginning of the quarter so I can understand why she was a bit disorganized at the start. Overall, the professor is nice and a good lecturer to learn for knowledge's sake, but her confusing grading breakdown and that fact that the tests are not super related to what she lectures on makes it a hard class to recommend.
0 transparency about what went on in scoring tests or the final, no opportunities to review mistakes and learn or make regrade requests. Really tough to follow anything when the lectures don't help with tests, incorrect/unclear instructions for the most part.
Professor Kumar had a lot going on this quarter including quarantine and family issues which caused her to miss 5-6 lectures. The lectures which she was on Zoom for required participation which was 30% of the grade (Case study 10%, MT 25% Final 35%). Whats worse is that she grades participation so arbitrarily because other students I know and myself received a 90 for participation even after we completed all required activities and spoke in class. The midterm and final were take-home and she gave us permission to use the online textbook. It blows my mind how not everyone gets an 100 on these tests but the averages were like 88 for the mt and 91 for the final. Back to Kumar, her lectures are very engaging and she is always happy to be teaching but shes a little disorganized. She doesn't always post slides on time or can't figure out zoom etc. The good news was this class is an easy A but the bad news is I didn't learn much.
Honestly the class wasn't too bad but the professor was extremely unclear on the grading. She didn't upload the final grades till 2 days after the due date and we had no way of knowing why we got the grade we did. Tests and quizzes were unable to be reviewed so we could see what we did wrong, and it was frustrating to just randomly see a grade at the end with no real explanation. For the actual material, the professor is really nice and tells a lot about her own experience in the entrepreneurial space, which is really cool. She also had to deal with some issues in the beginning of the quarter so I can understand why she was a bit disorganized at the start. Overall, the professor is nice and a good lecturer to learn for knowledge's sake, but her confusing grading breakdown and that fact that the tests are not super related to what she lectures on makes it a hard class to recommend.
0 transparency about what went on in scoring tests or the final, no opportunities to review mistakes and learn or make regrade requests. Really tough to follow anything when the lectures don't help with tests, incorrect/unclear instructions for the most part.
Professor Kumar had a lot going on this quarter including quarantine and family issues which caused her to miss 5-6 lectures. The lectures which she was on Zoom for required participation which was 30% of the grade (Case study 10%, MT 25% Final 35%). Whats worse is that she grades participation so arbitrarily because other students I know and myself received a 90 for participation even after we completed all required activities and spoke in class. The midterm and final were take-home and she gave us permission to use the online textbook. It blows my mind how not everyone gets an 100 on these tests but the averages were like 88 for the mt and 91 for the final. Back to Kumar, her lectures are very engaging and she is always happy to be teaching but shes a little disorganized. She doesn't always post slides on time or can't figure out zoom etc. The good news was this class is an easy A but the bad news is I didn't learn much.
Based on 7 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (6)
- Engaging Lectures (5)