Ramesh Srinivasan
Department of Information Studies
AD
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 3.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Often Funny
  • Participation Matters
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Would Take Again
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
60.9%
50.7%
40.6%
30.4%
20.3%
10.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

44.1%
36.8%
29.4%
22.1%
14.7%
7.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.8%
25.6%
20.5%
15.4%
10.3%
5.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.7%
29.8%
23.8%
17.9%
11.9%
6.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

20.0%
16.7%
13.3%
10.0%
6.7%
3.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.3%
21.9%
17.5%
13.2%
8.8%
4.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.6%
23.8%
19.0%
14.3%
9.5%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

23.1%
19.2%
15.4%
11.5%
7.7%
3.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

36.4%
30.3%
24.2%
18.2%
12.1%
6.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (11)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 25, 2010

I agree with the reviewer below 100%. I needed a social analysis GE last quarter, and this was the only one that fit in with my schedule. I have never met a "professor" who is so in love with himself. The 2 hour lecture/discussion was basically 110 minutes of the Ramesh show and then 10 minutes of two people sucking up by repeating his words. He seems to think that having a BS in industrial engineering makes him super special... it doesn't. I felt so much second hand embarrassment for him and the class he was trying so hard to impress. Please, if you are going to talk about information theory, don't get SNR wrong and don't call it a "transitor". It is a transistor, and a MOSFET is a type of transistor. He is very young, but so are many other professors at UCLA, and I've never met such a pompous ass.

He expected way too much for a GE. There was so much reading, and honestly a lot of it was dense pointless shit. This is a lower division class, and almost everyone here is taking it because they NEED to. There was more work to this class than any of the 4 other classes I was taking that quarter (including several upper division EE). Every part of this class was to make him feel better about himself. In the first class, the waitlist was full, and there were even more people in the classroom asking to be placed in (~35 maybe?). By fourth week, enrollment was 11/20.

This guy is too full of himself; he doesn't even have tenure yet, and I just feel that he is very immature, like he needs to remind his students every meeting that he is superior to us in every aspect. If you are okay with this, have no other classes, and want to practice brownnosing, then I suppose I can recommend Ramesh. I'm really sorry I ever met this guy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 25, 2010

I agree with the reviewer below 100%. I needed a social analysis GE last quarter, and this was the only one that fit in with my schedule. I have never met a "professor" who is so in love with himself. The 2 hour lecture/discussion was basically 110 minutes of the Ramesh show and then 10 minutes of two people sucking up by repeating his words. He seems to think that having a BS in industrial engineering makes him super special... it doesn't. I felt so much second hand embarrassment for him and the class he was trying so hard to impress. Please, if you are going to talk about information theory, don't get SNR wrong and don't call it a "transitor". It is a transistor, and a MOSFET is a type of transistor. He is very young, but so are many other professors at UCLA, and I've never met such a pompous ass.

He expected way too much for a GE. There was so much reading, and honestly a lot of it was dense pointless shit. This is a lower division class, and almost everyone here is taking it because they NEED to. There was more work to this class than any of the 4 other classes I was taking that quarter (including several upper division EE). Every part of this class was to make him feel better about himself. In the first class, the waitlist was full, and there were even more people in the classroom asking to be placed in (~35 maybe?). By fourth week, enrollment was 11/20.

This guy is too full of himself; he doesn't even have tenure yet, and I just feel that he is very immature, like he needs to remind his students every meeting that he is superior to us in every aspect. If you are okay with this, have no other classes, and want to practice brownnosing, then I suppose I can recommend Ramesh. I'm really sorry I ever met this guy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 3.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Engaging Lectures
    (3)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (3)
  • Often Funny
    (3)
  • Participation Matters
    (4)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (3)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (3)
  • Would Take Again
    (3)
  • Has Group Projects
    (3)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!