Richard von Glahn
Department of History
AD
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 28 Users
Easiness 2.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Participation Matters
  • Needs Textbook
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tolerates Tardiness
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
27.6%
23.0%
18.4%
13.8%
9.2%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.0%
20.8%
16.7%
12.5%
8.3%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

34.6%
28.8%
23.1%
17.3%
11.5%
5.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

31.3%
26.0%
20.8%
15.6%
10.4%
5.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.1%
20.1%
16.1%
12.1%
8.0%
4.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.6%
23.0%
18.4%
13.8%
9.2%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.2%
20.2%
16.2%
12.1%
8.1%
4.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

23.3%
19.4%
15.5%
11.6%
7.8%
3.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.4%
23.7%
19.0%
14.2%
9.5%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

39.5%
32.9%
26.3%
19.7%
13.2%
6.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (22)

3 of 3
3 of 3
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 18, 2004

I think Prof Von Glahn is a great professor even though he is monotonic, which is not his fault! He is well organized for every lecture and you can see that he is really trying to make the lecture more interesting. it is sad sometimes to see some students falling asleep in the class and you can tell that he really cares about the learning of his students. One time, he came to my 8 o'clock discussion just to sit in the back and listen to our opinion about the subject. In the last day of lecture, you can so tell that he loves chinese hist because of the way he describe his experience at Beijing. If you really have an interest in chinese hist i would recommend taking him, although some of the reading can be very boring (a few are interesting). I highly recommend Von Glahn!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 25, 2002

Professor von Glahn was fine. His lecture were fairly organized, though sometimes I feel like he speaks too fast and I lose some information here and there. The essays and exams weren't terribly hard, and the TA I had, Zhang, was pretty good and knowledgeable, though sometimes he mummbles a bit and was a bit hard to understand. However, some of the reading in the class, especially the Buddhist scriptures, were a bit painful to read.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 18, 2004

I think Prof Von Glahn is a great professor even though he is monotonic, which is not his fault! He is well organized for every lecture and you can see that he is really trying to make the lecture more interesting. it is sad sometimes to see some students falling asleep in the class and you can tell that he really cares about the learning of his students. One time, he came to my 8 o'clock discussion just to sit in the back and listen to our opinion about the subject. In the last day of lecture, you can so tell that he loves chinese hist because of the way he describe his experience at Beijing. If you really have an interest in chinese hist i would recommend taking him, although some of the reading can be very boring (a few are interesting). I highly recommend Von Glahn!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 25, 2002

Professor von Glahn was fine. His lecture were fairly organized, though sometimes I feel like he speaks too fast and I lose some information here and there. The essays and exams weren't terribly hard, and the TA I had, Zhang, was pretty good and knowledgeable, though sometimes he mummbles a bit and was a bit hard to understand. However, some of the reading in the class, especially the Buddhist scriptures, were a bit painful to read.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
3 of 3
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 28 Users
Easiness 2.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (9)
  • Participation Matters
    (8)
  • Needs Textbook
    (8)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (6)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (5)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!