Robert T M'Closkey
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Often Funny
  • Would Take Again
  • Issues PTEs
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
55.0%
45.8%
36.7%
27.5%
18.3%
9.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

100.0%
83.3%
66.7%
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

94.1%
78.4%
62.7%
47.1%
31.4%
15.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

78.3%
65.2%
52.2%
39.1%
26.1%
13.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

80.0%
66.7%
53.3%
40.0%
26.7%
13.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

46.7%
38.9%
31.1%
23.3%
15.6%
7.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A
March 23, 2019

Obviously the workload and difficulty are relative to the student. The only work we did was doing the lab and writing up the lab reports. You have to answer some questions in your report that are in the lab instructions. So I felt the workload to be really light.

The coursework isn't that hard to be honest. In the 1st half of the course, he lectures about the synthesis and analysis equations of the Fourier transform and its inverse; for continuous time and discrete time. Reviews nyquist plots and throws out whatever you learned in 171A out the window. You learn how to do controller design in the frequency domain, very handy tool. What was awesome was reconstructing plant models from random signals, as well as from white noise; very powerful. You learn about cross-correlations and auto-correlations.

Since a lot of grad students were also in the class, he introduced material towards the end of class that were at the "grad" level. Honestly it wasn't that hard, I just wish I had a better linear algebra instructor so that I can remember singular value decomposition and etc. But it wasn't hard to follow.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A
March 23, 2019

Obviously the workload and difficulty are relative to the student. The only work we did was doing the lab and writing up the lab reports. You have to answer some questions in your report that are in the lab instructions. So I felt the workload to be really light.

The coursework isn't that hard to be honest. In the 1st half of the course, he lectures about the synthesis and analysis equations of the Fourier transform and its inverse; for continuous time and discrete time. Reviews nyquist plots and throws out whatever you learned in 171A out the window. You learn how to do controller design in the frequency domain, very handy tool. What was awesome was reconstructing plant models from random signals, as well as from white noise; very powerful. You learn about cross-correlations and auto-correlations.

Since a lot of grad students were also in the class, he introduced material towards the end of class that were at the "grad" level. Honestly it wasn't that hard, I just wish I had a better linear algebra instructor so that I can remember singular value decomposition and etc. But it wasn't hard to follow.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
  • Often Funny
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
  • Issues PTEs
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!