Professor

Sudip Chakravarty

AD
3.4
Overall Ratings
Based on 32 Users
Easiness 1.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 1.7 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (32)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
March 3, 2019
Quarter: Winter 2015
Grade: N/A

The professor just copy everything from the book in the lectures. He is very arrogant and think every questions you asked as trivial questions. Not recommend to take.

Helpful?

4 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 23, 2012
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

The professor teaching is perfect for grad students. Although his assignments are hard, but they are very creative and helps you understands most of the topic. unfortunately his assignments don't cover all the topics he discusses, but you can pick up some interesting stuff through out the lecture. He talk fast and right fast, you have to give him all of your hearing the whole time.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 8, 2009
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

This professor is not a very effective teacher. He is not difficult, but he does not present the material in a clear manner. I would recommend other physics majors to look elsewhere if they really want to learn the subject. Regarding lectures, they were all right, but they did not elaborate on the book and did not clarify the difficulties of the material. The homeworks were assigned every week, but they were medium difficulty.
The exams: formulas were given, but sometimes there was just not enough time to finish everything (5~10 extra minutes would have been very useful).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Jan. 2, 2018
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A-

The way this class was organized was relatively straightforward, which is great when you're first taking a quantum class. The questions on the midterm and final are mostly from concepts already covered, and there's a good balance of the math and conceptual components of the class. Sudip goes into very great detail about the topics and he does genuinely care that every single student understands every topic covered, which is admirable especially in the physics department. One problem I had though was that we moved at a very slow speed. Most of the class was chapter 2 of Griffiths, and then there was a speed round for chapter 3 over the last two weeks, which I would have appreciated if it were more balanced and sped up other parts instead of lingering. Some lectures had quite a bit of overlap with other previous lectures without stating anything new, and it felt like it didn't actually contribute overall. But I am happy to be taking 115B with Sudip. Also the TA Nico is amazing and you should definitely go to his office hours.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 22, 2019
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: B

Professor Sudip Chakravarthy was a good lecturer, and I personally enjoyed taking this whole series with him. He does have a strong passion for the course material and an occasional sense of humor. He's patient with students and takes all questions seriously, and he's very much approachable whether in class or OH. He tended to include at least some conceptual content in previous quarter exams. For 115C, he emphasized that the quarter was focused more on applications. As always, make sure to carefully study all the homework problems as test questions are often similar to an extent.

SELLING study/test materials (Spring 2018) for this course including past exams (midterm) and a cheat sheet as well as HW solutions. uclastudent17@gmail.com

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 115B
Quarter: Winter 2015
Grade: N/A
March 3, 2019

The professor just copy everything from the book in the lectures. He is very arrogant and think every questions you asked as trivial questions. Not recommend to take.

Helpful?

4 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 241B
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 23, 2012

The professor teaching is perfect for grad students. Although his assignments are hard, but they are very creative and helps you understands most of the topic. unfortunately his assignments don't cover all the topics he discusses, but you can pick up some interesting stuff through out the lecture. He talk fast and right fast, you have to give him all of your hearing the whole time.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 115A
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 8, 2009

This professor is not a very effective teacher. He is not difficult, but he does not present the material in a clear manner. I would recommend other physics majors to look elsewhere if they really want to learn the subject. Regarding lectures, they were all right, but they did not elaborate on the book and did not clarify the difficulties of the material. The homeworks were assigned every week, but they were medium difficulty.
The exams: formulas were given, but sometimes there was just not enough time to finish everything (5~10 extra minutes would have been very useful).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 115A
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A-
Jan. 2, 2018

The way this class was organized was relatively straightforward, which is great when you're first taking a quantum class. The questions on the midterm and final are mostly from concepts already covered, and there's a good balance of the math and conceptual components of the class. Sudip goes into very great detail about the topics and he does genuinely care that every single student understands every topic covered, which is admirable especially in the physics department. One problem I had though was that we moved at a very slow speed. Most of the class was chapter 2 of Griffiths, and then there was a speed round for chapter 3 over the last two weeks, which I would have appreciated if it were more balanced and sped up other parts instead of lingering. Some lectures had quite a bit of overlap with other previous lectures without stating anything new, and it felt like it didn't actually contribute overall. But I am happy to be taking 115B with Sudip. Also the TA Nico is amazing and you should definitely go to his office hours.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 115C
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: B
March 22, 2019

Professor Sudip Chakravarthy was a good lecturer, and I personally enjoyed taking this whole series with him. He does have a strong passion for the course material and an occasional sense of humor. He's patient with students and takes all questions seriously, and he's very much approachable whether in class or OH. He tended to include at least some conceptual content in previous quarter exams. For 115C, he emphasized that the quarter was focused more on applications. As always, make sure to carefully study all the homework problems as test questions are often similar to an extent.

SELLING study/test materials (Spring 2018) for this course including past exams (midterm) and a cheat sheet as well as HW solutions. uclastudent17@gmail.com

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!