God... Please do trust the 1.6 easiness score of this class! This quarter has already been hard, and this class made my day even harder. Our TA is a nice guy and he does have some cool opinion, but he really scored us to harsh. I follow every instruction he gave me based on the first paper but still got a B for my second paper. If you need a pretty good GPA, please do not attend this class!

Prof. Lal presents a very biased view of Indian history - he often states his own opinions as facts, and does not respond well to students questioning his statements. If you want to gain an objective overview of India, don't take this class with Professor Lal.

tl;dr: not an easy A, but not difficult either. Attend lecture and you'll be fine.

Full Disclosure: I'm from India, so I learnt Indian history in high school. Having said that, I found this class really interesting.

The final grade was 20% participation in the discussion section, 30% from the take home midterm exam and 50% from the final.

Some of the other reviews of this course seem to complain about the reading workload (~150 pages per week), but you don't really need to do the reading. I personally found that attending class was far more rewarding. He tells you the stuff that is important/ unimportant, and if you pay enough attention, you can easily predict the questions that will come on the exams.

Professor Lal's lecturing style itself is quite engaging, but he gets distracted a lot and tends to go off on tangents quite often. Also, he sometimes doesn't explain certain terms that people who aren't Indian may not intuitively understand. He also liberally mixes in his opinions with facts.

We had a take-home midterm over the weekend in week 6, 2 essays, each 2-3 pages double spaced. The exam itself wasn't difficult, and he asked the most obvious questions in it. It's important to cite the reading material (he scans it to the class website) if you want an A instead of a B. About a week before the midterm, he went over a "hypothetical midterm question", which was on the actual midterm, so once again, attend lecture.

The final was answering 4 out of 9 essay questions. The questions on the final were NOT ID questions, since the material was so vast. Instead, the questions were about the major themes he covered in the course. In section, the wonderful TA Vipin literally listed out 5 major themes that he thought were important, and all 5 were on the final.

Professor Lal himself is a cool guy, and some of his ideas are pretty radical. As a Professor, he was very kind and even offered to have lunch with us after class one day. He has office hours twice a week and lets you pick his brain.

This isn't really a throwaway easy GE, but if you attend lecture and put in a weekend of effort for the midterm and a few more days of studying for the final, you'll get that A pretty easily.

Prof. Lal definitely knows what he is talking about and is an expert on Indian history and culture, however he talks really quickly and the lectures can get quite disorganized because he literally just says whatever he thinks. He also fails to elaborate on or define many Indian terms which makes the lectures that much more difficult to understand if you don't have previous knowledge of Hindi or the course material. It's just so much material to learn in such a short time that it gets really overwhelming. There also aren't very many dates or times which makes a lot of what you learn seem very circumstantial. Ultimately, it's an interesting course however there is just too much you are expected to know that isn't explained well enough. Also, Dan Newman as a ta is absolutely no help.

HARD AS F***

I was taking Korean history (K50)at the same time, and Korean history was easy as hell in comparison.

I took it just to fulfill my study GE, it was one of my biggest mistakes in my 3 years of college life...the midterm is 2 essay questions (take home)...TA was a harsh grader bitch....the final has 4 essay questions (8 prompts given before exam)+ 10 IDs.

Requires EXTENSIVE reading....it was a nightmare, really.....

Lecture was really hard to understand (probably because English isn't my first language + he loves using words that no one really uses in real life just to show off)

I did it P/NP and luckily I passed

This is highly UNRECOMMENDED, AVOID at all cost!

I took this class after reading the previous evals, thinking it would be great and interesting. Well, I don't have much to say on how interesting it is but I can say that I switched the grading to P/NP and I can't even imagine how other people with letter grading feel. Lectures are super boring and he does talk fast and sometimes it's difficult to figure out what's important and what's just random. Midterm was take home, two essays which weren't all that bad. Essay is 10 IDs, and he DOESN'T give you the terms ahead of time, and a bunch of essays (he gives you 9, 5 of which are on the final, 4 of which you have to do). Unless you're super desperate to fulfill this GE, I don't rec taking this class.

Not at all an easy GE. Lectures were extremely hard to follow, amount of assigned reading was absolutely ridiculous. Final is worth 50% of final grade and is incredibly difficult. Basically, do not take this class unless you... nope, just don't take it. There is no reason why you'd want to.

This review is slightly biased as I am an Indian and I previously learnt Indian history. If you are up for the challenge/are in Indian/are a history major/like history and have previous knowledge of it, I'd recommend taking this class. If not, STAY AWAY lol. There have been many times in his class where I've wondered if I would have survived if I was not an Indian and frankly the answer is NO WAY. He teaches the class as if the information is common knowledge and everyone knows it. Its quite fast paced too so there's no time to actually dwell on what you've learnt. Having said this, Professor Lal is an excellent professor , and is extremely nice.

Be sure to attend discussion sections because that's when you can openly talk about what you have learnt in class with a smaller group and really formulate your ideas about topics that were taught in the lecture. The final had many questions that were covered in discussion SO DON'T SKIP IT.

Midterm is a take home essay which is extremely easy. I would recommend doing some light reading/scan through the assigned texts because quotations are required. There are also occasional homework assignments, but these are super easy. For this quarter, they let us choose the topics we wanted to write about (based on a certain period that we were learning about at the time). You are allowed to rewrite both the midterm+ homework assignments as many times as you want until your grade is bumped up (this is assuming you get the same/similar TA as I had). Make sure you take advantage of this because the final is 50% of your grade.

Regarding the reading, it's quite frankly a joke - there are hundreds of pages assigned a week. Your head will explode if you try to do all of it. I didn't understand a word of most of the books, and again I have significant knowledge about Indian history which should say something haha. Skim through books from Keay, the Ramayana, the Mahabharata, Gandhis book, and Professor Lal's books. The other books are pointless and are a complete waste of time. You have to do a little bit of reading because you have to use quotations in your papers, but don't try to read everything; its impossible.

So overall I'd say its a good class but be careful. Don't jump into this class thinking its easy or else you'll be screwed. If you work hard and put in the effort though, it should be an easy A.

As someone who isn't Indian and had no clue anything about Indian history, I can tell you this class was pretty difficult but its still possible to get an A. It was very difficult for me to follow along with Professor Lal because of the sheer amount of topics included in this course and how foreign they were to me. Even though I showed up to every lecture, I always felt like I was 3 lectures behind. There are a LOT of readings (about 150 pages a week) however, it is better to figure out earlier that you don't actually need to read all of it. Out of all the books he asks you to buy, my recommendation is to read the comic book first to learn some basic terms if you have no previous knowledge like me. Also focus more time on reading John Keay because it covers everything. I personally read the Ramayana and then sparknoted/read the Mahabharata and then basically skipped over any parts in all of the readings he doesn't mention in the lectures. Even though the class felt difficult, I felt the essay grading was pretty fair. I put a lot of effort into the Discussion group "review" essays and got As on all of them. The midterm and final was a pain in the ass though because of the crazy amount of essays, but you just have to hunker down and prepare thoroughly and then they will feel like much more straightforward questions. Our TA also made a point to mention the topics again that were likely going to be on tests which was helpful.

In his lecture slides, every time you see a chart, make sure to copy it down. I found that a lot of the essay questions were asking you to "explain the development of...." or "what were the causes of..." or " compare and contrast...." and things like that.

Overall, this class did help me become a faster writer and I definitely came out of it with a lot of new knowledge that I otherwise wouldn't have had if I didn't take this class.

In this class, discussions are worth 20%, the midterm is worth 30%, and the final is worth 50%. Your grade is largely dependent on the TA, because the TA is the only person who grades both exams and decides your discussion grade (at least, that's how it was this quarter).

It is not an easy A GE. I did receive an A, but I also put a lot of effort into the class and participated a lot in discussions. It's doable but depends on what you put in because neither lecture nor discussion is mandatory.

The 20% discussion grade is given holistically based on a few writing assignments and then participation. We can rewrite assignments for better grades and it's pretty easy to get full credit.

The midterm and final are essay responses and both rely on doing the readings, although only half of the readings assigned are useful. (Keay, Metcalfe, Thapar are best to know.) The questions are very direct and obvious, and all exam material was discussed in sections which was really helpful! Just make sure you have a thesis and you should be fine.

Professor Lal as a lecturer is clearly very knowledgeable, but he also tends to ramble and doesn't give clear answers if you ask questions or go to office hours. We were perpetually a few lectures behind in material and a lot of stuff was removed from the curriculum. Shantanu was my TA, and he decided most of the stuff that was written above. I liked him a lot and he allowed a rewrite of the midterm for a higher grade, which is nice, and he takes the time to meet with you personally if you have specific questions about writing. He's an awesome TA but Lal is just ok. The class itself is hard!