Yongjie Hu
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
AD
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Participation Matters
  • Has Group Projects
  • Issues PTEs
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
70.4%
58.6%
46.9%
35.2%
23.5%
11.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

53.6%
44.6%
35.7%
26.8%
17.9%
8.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.2%
24.3%
19.4%
14.6%
9.7%
4.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

74.2%
61.8%
49.5%
37.1%
24.7%
12.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

52.6%
43.9%
35.1%
26.3%
17.5%
8.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

60.9%
50.7%
40.6%
30.4%
20.3%
10.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

50.0%
41.7%
33.3%
25.0%
16.7%
8.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: N/A
March 24, 2019

One of the best professors I have had at UCLA. Professor Hu's class is very enjoyable. He cares about students' understanding the materials and he is very knowledgeable about it. I believe that I learned a lot from this class and it helps prepare me better for my future career.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
June 4, 2017

Professor Hu is absolutely amazing. He is very smart and always very helpful for the class. He really cares about us students and makes sure that we all understand the content. The classroom settings are a little outdated: Some computers were old and slow; Experiment equipment seem to be existing for more than decades. But the professor made the class easy to learn and very enjoyable. Overall, the professor is excellent and I enjoyed a quarter of learning experiments and data analysis.

Regarding the lab report, the professor created different categories which helps. You can find lab reports from previous years which are helpful as references, but be careful though, there was a group in my class copied the whole lab report from previous years and they were caught by the TAs (yes, the TAs are very sniffing). Well, UCLA honesty policy is strictly enforced here.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: N/A
May 6, 2017

Honestly, the professor isn't even that bad. The class though-the class is a Kafkaesque nightmare of busywork, unclear instructions, useless material, aging equipment (they use computers running Windows 95! your tuition dollars at work...), and did I mention the bulk of your grade is tied to group reports? A student desiring to do well in this class must do so at the cost of participating in more worthwhile activities, because the amount of crap you have to deal with will blot out the sun. Prepare for long nights spent doing the mental equivalent of digging holes in the ground and filling them in, with the added knowledge that you're going deeper into student loan debt for the privilege to do so. This class is proof that the MAE department does not care about the quality or relevance of undergraduate education. As you perform monotonous tests abandoned by industry decades ago and contemplate just ending it all while sifting through the garbage heap of meaningless data, remember this warning and don't complain that nobody told you It'd be THIS bad.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: N/A
March 24, 2019

One of the best professors I have had at UCLA. Professor Hu's class is very enjoyable. He cares about students' understanding the materials and he is very knowledgeable about it. I believe that I learned a lot from this class and it helps prepare me better for my future career.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
June 4, 2017

Professor Hu is absolutely amazing. He is very smart and always very helpful for the class. He really cares about us students and makes sure that we all understand the content. The classroom settings are a little outdated: Some computers were old and slow; Experiment equipment seem to be existing for more than decades. But the professor made the class easy to learn and very enjoyable. Overall, the professor is excellent and I enjoyed a quarter of learning experiments and data analysis.

Regarding the lab report, the professor created different categories which helps. You can find lab reports from previous years which are helpful as references, but be careful though, there was a group in my class copied the whole lab report from previous years and they were caught by the TAs (yes, the TAs are very sniffing). Well, UCLA honesty policy is strictly enforced here.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: N/A
May 6, 2017

Honestly, the professor isn't even that bad. The class though-the class is a Kafkaesque nightmare of busywork, unclear instructions, useless material, aging equipment (they use computers running Windows 95! your tuition dollars at work...), and did I mention the bulk of your grade is tied to group reports? A student desiring to do well in this class must do so at the cost of participating in more worthwhile activities, because the amount of crap you have to deal with will blot out the sun. Prepare for long nights spent doing the mental equivalent of digging holes in the ground and filling them in, with the added knowledge that you're going deeper into student loan debt for the privilege to do so. This class is proof that the MAE department does not care about the quality or relevance of undergraduate education. As you perform monotonous tests abandoned by industry decades ago and contemplate just ending it all while sifting through the garbage heap of meaningless data, remember this warning and don't complain that nobody told you It'd be THIS bad.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (1)
  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
  • Issues PTEs
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!